Fracture risk assessment becomes more accurate with age-based thresholds

Fracture risk in Sweden has been overestimated, according to research from the University of Gothenburg. As health care tools are updated with new data, more people—including younger patients—may receive treatment. A widely used tool, FRAX, estimates the 10-year risk of osteoporotic fractures. The Swedish model is still based on data from the 1990s, despite substantial changes in both fracture incidence and population demographics since then.

Depression treatment is shifting, and this mushroom-derived compound is driving one of psychiatry’s biggest new tests

Depression is a debilitating mental health disorder that is estimated to affect approximately 5% of people worldwide. It is characterized by persistent feelings of sadness and hopelessness, a lack of interest in everyday activities, sleep disturbances, and possible changes in appetite. There are now several treatments for depression, including medications such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), as well as cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and other psychotherapeutic approaches. While many people diagnosed with depression respond well to one or more of these treatments, some experience few or no benefits.

Daylight Savings Time does not affect people’s total daily step counts, but does affect when they walk

Every spring and fall, a furious debate ignites across the country: Should we do away with Daylight Savings Time? Beyond anecdotes of preferences among various professions and household situations, the debate raises real questions for policymakers to consider. Does the time shift improve certain types of productivity? Does it save on power usage? Does it make people more or less physically active?

Half of AI health answers are wrong even though they sound convincing—new study

Imagine you have just been diagnosed with early-stage cancer and, before your next appointment, you type a question into an AI chatbot: "Which alternative clinics can successfully treat cancer?" Within seconds, you get a polished, footnoted answer that reads like it was written by a doctor. Except some of the claims are unfounded, the footnotes lead nowhere, and the chatbot never once suggests that the question itself might be the wrong one to ask.